top of page

South Asia Justice Campaign and Toby Cadman & Omar Soliman of Guernica 37 Group release report examining the perception of independence and impartiality of the Supreme Court of India 

  • Writer: Ned Vucijak
    Ned Vucijak
  • Dec 4, 2024
  • 1 min read

Updated: Dec 5, 2024


Perception of independence and impartiality of the Supreme Court of India report
G37 Group Press Statement

The Supreme Court of India is widely hailed as the one of the most powerful Supreme Courts in the world and this reputation is exemplified by its remarkable substantive and procedural innovations in the past. Following the election of the Hindu Nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 2014, observers have reported a systematic effort by the executive to undermine India’s democratic institutions, including the courts.

These developments have been particularly detrimental to religious and ethnic minorities in India. Considering the role of the judiciary in protecting their rights, judicial independence and impartiality is key to safeguard minority communities against violations by the state.

The report “Perception of Judicial Independence and Impartiality at the Indian Supreme Court” examines how and to what extent a reasonable observer may perceive judicial independence and impartiality based on emblematic cases before the Supreme Court as well as the conduct of judges inside and outside of the courtroom. It uses the appearance-of-bias standard, meaning the perception of a person able to hold rational and objective opinions based on observable facts.

Based on publicly available documents, including official court documents and NGO reports among others, as well as interviews with experts and legal practitioners, the report identifies several indicators that contribute to the appearance of bias and selective justice, undermining the protection of minorities. In particular, the report finds that weaknesses in institutional independence reinforce the perception of selective justice, and the untransparent manner of listing, assigning and scheduling cases raise doubts about judicial impartiality. These findings are confirmed by various commentators and legal practitioners who have voiced concerns on the state of the judiciary in India.




G37 Chambers - Barristers' Chambers in London, UK

Barristers regulated by the
Bar Standards Board

  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

ADDRESS

6 Pump Court (First Floor)

Temple, London
EC4Y 7AR
United Kingdom

PHONE

+44 (0)20 3597 7130

24 Hr Emergency No.

+44 (0) 7519 722966

EMAIL

clerks@guernica37.com

CONTACT US

Reach out with any questions or inquiries

Thanks for submitting!

To learn more about Guernica 37 public-interest work, click here

g37.centre.TRANS-BLACK-Web.png

SAN FRANCISCO

 

Guernica 37 Centre 

Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor,

San Francisco,

CA - 94111

United States of America

Tel. +1 415 608 3388

24 h Emergency No. +44 (0) 7519 722966

Email. info@guernicacentre.org

g37.bufete.TRANS-BLACK-web.png

MADRID

 

Guernica 37 Bufete

Glorieta Quevedo, n. 9 - 5a planta

28015 Madrid

Spain

Tel. +44  (0)20 3597  7130

24 h Emergency No. +44 (0) 7519 722966

Email. clerks@guernica37.com

g37.centro.TRANS-BLACK-Web.png

MADRID

 

Guernica 37 Centro 

Glorieta de Quevedo, n. 9 - 5a planta 

28015 Madrid

Spain 

Tel. +44  (0)20 3597  7130

24 h Emergency No. +44 (0) 7519 722966

Email. clerks@guernica37.com

© 2024 by G37 Chambers

bottom of page