top of page

International Legal News – 16 September 2024

Updated: Sep 23

The following media round up on international and foreign policy issues from around the world for the period of 9 to 16 September 2024.

 

Guernica 37 will provide weekly media updates from the International Criminal Court, European Court of Human Rights, United Nations, European Union and other sources. Should you wish to contribute or submit a media summary, opinion piece or blog, please send to Ned Vucijak at nenadv@guernica37.com for consideration.

 

Round up on international and foreign policy issues from around the world
Guernica 37 International Legal News

Australia – 16 Sep 2024

 

Elon Musk called the Australian government ‘fascists’ and criticized a new Australian bill aimed at combating misinformation, arguing it infringes on free speech and innovation. The legislation would fine online companies up to 5 percent of their global revenue for facilitating misinformation that is “seriously harmful and verifiably false”.

 

 

Netherlands – 16 Sep 2024

 

The Hague Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of an individual accused of breaching Dutch sanctions against ISIS, marking a significant precedent in the enforcement of counterterrorism measures. The court reaffirmed the illegality of financing or supporting terrorist organizations, even indirectly.

 

 

Angola – 16 Sep 2024

 

Angolan activists who have been wrongly imprisoned for over a year have been denied essential medical care, prompting calls for their immediate release. Four individuals were convicted for participating in peaceful protests, raising concerns over Angola’s suppression of dissent.

 

 

West Bank – 12 Sep 2024

 

The escalation of violence in the West Bank raises concerns over potential future atrocities as tensions between settlers and Palestinian residents intensify. Armed attacks and retaliations have increased, signalling a heightened risk of widespread violence. Calls for international intervention have grown, with warnings that the situation may spiral into even larger-scale human rights violations.

 

 

Australia – 12 Sep 2024

 

Australia’s complex legal path toward addressing war crimes allegations committed by its military personnel continues to unfold. Investigations and prosecutions remain mired in challenges such as lack of transparency and institutional reluctance. The process demonstrates the difficulty in achieving accountability in international humanitarian law, particularly in cases involving national armed forces.

 

 

Tajikistan – 11 Sep 2024

 

The Pamiri minority in Tajikistan continues to face systemic discrimination in what has been termed an overlooked human rights crisis. Reports detail arbitrary detentions, torture, and restrictions on cultural and religious practices, with little attention from the international community. Amnesty International highlighted that the situation demands urgent intervention to address the rights of this persecuted group.

 

 

Mongolia – 11 Sep 2024

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit in defiance of the ICC Prosecutor’s requested arrest warrant has sparked international criticism. The visit highlights the limits of the International Criminal Court’s enforcement power, particularly when dealing with powerful states. Mark Kersten argues that the ICC action nonetheless makes travel and diplomacy more difficult for Putin.

 

 

Occupied Palestinian Territories – 9 Sep 2024

 

Following an OHCHR annual report on corporate activity in Palestine, the international community is increasingly calling for an end to the “business as usual” approach toward unlawful Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Critics argue that these settlements constitute a violation of international law, fostering ongoing conflict and instability. There is growing pressure on states and businesses to cease activities that sustain settlement expansion.

 

 

Pakistan – 9 Sep 2024

 

Pakistan’s new Peaceful Assembly and Public Order Act has been criticized for imposing severe restrictions on the right to protest. The legislation, which grants broad powers to law enforcement to curtail demonstrations, is seen as a direct threat to civil liberties. Human rights groups have expressed concern that the law could be used to stifle dissent and silence political opposition.

 

コメント


bottom of page